Wincanton's focused community website, providing news and information including a full calendar
News » Neighbourhood

Pick 'n' Mix Speed Limits

Friday 20 February 2015, 19:01
By David Rendel

Confusing speed limit signage on the A359, between Galhampton and Castle Cary

Confusion reigns in Galhampton. Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Candidate, David Rendel, has spotted a set of contradictory speed limit signs near his North Barrow home.

He found them on the A359 as you drive north out of Galhampton towards Castle Cary. In the north-bound lane the speed limit, as written on the tarmac, increases from 40 to 50 mph but the sign to the left of the road specifies a 40 mph speed limit still. The rather faded sign on the right-hand side of the road agrees with the 50 mph sign painted on the road itself.

It beggars belief that the County Council can have left these contradictory signs in place for so long,” David said. “How on earth is the motorist supposed to know what is legal, when the council itself does not seem to have made up its mind?

The council’s incompetence adds confusion to an already dangerous stretch of road.

Mr Rendel has now notified the police about this problem, which would presumably make any prosecution for speeding in the area a non-starter.




Comments

davidsmith
Posts: 1
Comment
A bit harsh, no?
Reply #1 on : Fri February 20, 2015, 19:07:01
Kudos to Mr Rendel for pointing it out after all this time. Those certainly aren't new signs. This is definitely cause for a bit of a chuckle, but I can't help noticing that the 50 sign on the right is at a bit of an angle. Isn't it possible that the signs have been tampered with? The location makes that seem a little unlikely, but maybe the signs have simply been spun around.

I suppose honestly I'm not entirely convinced of my own theory, but as one of many explanations for why this might have happened, mistake or otherwise, I feel it's worth using it to justify mentioning that I'm finding it continually irritating that people are constantly so judgmental, overly critical and in some cases outright offensive towards the authorities. It seems to be a common trait amongst politicians, unfortunately, who seem to want to spend far too much time and energy criticising their competition.

It seems like quite a stretch to assign blame on the County Council as a whole, when the reality of the situation - assuming there was no vandalism involved - is that a worker in a high-vis jacket probably just put them up wrong by mistake.

What's more noteworthy is that the mistake went undetected for so long, as Mr Rendel points out. The irony is that it's surely more likely that a local resident would spot and report this issue - as has been the case - and so isn't it almost as valid to accuse locals like Rendel himself, driving by so frequently for years, of failing to notice something so clear and dangerous?

It seems more realistic to admit that in any case the truth is probably that people don't really pay any attention to the numbers painted on the road. I'll admit I've driven that stretch on many occasions and probably never even looked at anything but the reflective sign and never thought to question to validity of the change to 40 when entering a more built up area. Even now, from this picture, I'm not sure if it's the signs or the paint that's wrong.

I certainly don't feel it comes down only to "Council incompetence". That label is surely only applicable to the individual(s) who put the signs up, and those who continually failed to notice it for years. If not vandalism this is just a silly mistake, the likes of which we're all just as likely to make every day.

Maybe some good can come of it, keeping everyone on their toes, but the persistent negativity surely comes at a cost. I believe in upholding standards, but the attitude we seem to want to take to those who make mistakes just doesn't seem constructive. The political system could stand to be overhauled on that principle alone. Listening to the banter in the House of Commons is an embarrassment to the human race, yet somehow never surprises.

The point of an article like this ought to be a bit of a laugh, rather than an opportunity to bash those who *might* be responsible for the mistake.
Last Edit: February 20, 2015, 19:08:08 by davidsmith  
Nick Colbert
Posts: 1
Comment
Local?
Reply #2 on : Sat February 21, 2015, 18:08:18
David is of course quite right, it is a bit of a laugh, someone almost certainly spun the sign on the left round, trying to blame the County Council is just plain churlish.

However I suspect the real reason for the article was to make it look as if Mr Rendel had some connection with this area, presumably he has just rented "his home" in North Barrow for the duration of the general election campaign but is trying to make it look as if he is local.

His real home is in the Newbury area where he was, according to Newburytoday holding court last Saturday whilst the Conservative and Green candidates were out campaigning here, link below:

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2015/former-mp-david-rendel-in-thatcham-today-saturday-to-hear-you-concerns

Mr Rendel had wanted to stand in Newbury again but was ‘stunned’ when told of the Lib/dems approach to a Labour candidate to replace him.

He said that he would report the allegations immediately to senior members of the party locally, and in 24 hours had publicly announced that he would not stand at the next general election, again link below:

http://www.newburytoday.co.uk/2012/lib-dems-in-secret-talks-to-poach-newbury-labour-activist

So there you have what I suspect was the real reason for this article, to get the phrase "near his home" in to make those who do not know think he has some local connection.

Its all a bit politics (or substitute a word of your choice).
Last Edit: March 23, 2015, 09:05:20 by Nick Colbert  

Login to comment!

© 2009 Wincanton Window    -    Site designed, hosted and maintained by Link-2