Wincanton's focused community website, providing news and information including a full calendar
News » Councils » Town Council

Let's Be Clear On How Town Cash Is Spent

Monday 6 August 2012, 14:09
By Western Gazette

Article first published in the Western Gazette.

Wincanton Town HallWincanton Town Council has written to other market towns over councillors' fears money from the town will be spent in Yeovil.

Councillors say they don't want money for community facilities generated from agreements with developers in Wincanton-going elsewhere. The town is now demanding clarification over exactly where the so-called "section 106" money will be spent.

A section 106 agreement binds a developer to paying towards community infrastructure, including health and leisure provisions to benefit local residents.

In a letter to other market towns in South Somerset, town clerk Sam Atherton said:

Sam Atherton, Wincanton Town Clerk"Wincanton Town Council believes any monies given to South Somerset District Council under section 106 agreements for new developments should stay in the town and not be used elsewhere.

"We would like to hear other town council views on this subject and whether your council would be interested in joining Wincanton Town Council in seeking clarification of where these contributions will be spent."

The request was met with support from Langport Town Council, which will support its Wincanton counterparts in demanding any section 106 money is spent where it is raised. Wincanton Town Council will now wait to hear back from all of South Somerset's market towns before considering a plan of action.

Conservative district councillor Nick Colbert said:

District Councillor Nick Colbert"I'm glad to see Wincanton Town Council is alerting other towns as to how the district council is taking their health and leisure monies to provide more facilities for Yeovil.

"It is appalling. Market towns need their health and leisure monies spending on the towns the money was raised in."

The criticism came after it was revealed the district council could redistribute cash it would receive if a development goes ahead near Verrington Hospital.

More than 80 per cent of the cash for "off-site" provisions would be taken out of the area, according to the council's early calculations.

Such off-site provision would include more than £17,000 towards expanding and enhancing the Octagon Theatre in Yeovil.

A district council spokesman said: "The council can appreciate that it may appear to residents that contributions are being sought from development in their area towards projects outside of the immediate local area.

"We believe most people will recognise that it is simply not financially feasible or sensible to seek to deliver professional arts and theatre in every market town area." It was therefore reasonable to enhance the Octagon Theatre, serving the whole district, the spokesman added.

This article first appeared in the Western Gazette, but if you have a story you want published you can also send your press releases to Wincanton Window - we never run out of space so you can tell the whole story!




Comments

johnsmith
Posts: 2
Comment
Section 106 Finance
Reply #1 on : Tue August 07, 2012, 10:06:06
It's good to see that our District Council are very aware of the concerns of our Town Council, and I am sure many of our residents. This section 106 finance is very important finance.

However it would seem that this same District Council is strangely unaware that Wincanton Town Council, and probably the vast majority of the people of Wincanton, have no or very little interest in shoring up the financially struggling Octagon Theatre in Yeovil.

Maybe the District Council would like to furnish us with statistics showing how many people from Wincanton, or indeed other surrounding towns and villages actually attend events at this loss making venue. I suspect that is they were reliant on the people of Wincanton they would have been bankrupt years ago. Why is it that there is a natural tendency to pour finance into such institutions. Are they a deserving charity, or could all this money be better used in more practical ways.

Locally in Wincanton we have a hard working group of Friends at Verrington raising funds for a much needed scanner. I think that most would say that this would be a much better use of section 106 finance raised in Wincanton.

What about The balsam centre with all the charities and community services that work hard there for the benefit of our community? Why do they have to fill out copious forms throughout the year begging for finance to keep valuable community services open and service those in need? Section 106 finance would make a huge difference here.

What does The Octagon Theatre provide for Wincanton and surrounding communities other than the vanity of professional events? If people want to support The octagon Theatre let them pay the going rate for tickets and keep it in the black. SSDC should not be subsidising professional organisation like this.

Before I get shot down for being anti-theatre I should say that the best productions I have ever attended in Yeovil (by a long way) were at “The swan Theatre”. Compared to The swan The Octagon is bland. To be honest I think it is trying very hard to be something that it can never be. It will never be The Theatre Royal in Bath.

So I say that our District Council should be very, very careful house it spends the money that it gather’s in from its hard pressed satellite towns and villages. The most recent move of this nature arose when SSDC forced Wincanton and others into paying an annual fee to stop them introducing Pay & Display meters in our car parks. They told us that they would get circa £30,000 income from this venture, but would be gracious and give us a huge discount asking only for £24,000 per annum for the next three years. After that “the only way is up” (Now there was a bad song). I can’t see SSDC giving us a bigger discount.

How much of that £24,000 will be spent in Wincanton? Very little I expect. So for SSDC to say….

"We believe most people will recognise that it is simply not financially feasible or sensible to seek to deliver professional arts and theatre in every market town area." It was therefore reasonable to enhance the Octagon Theatre, serving the whole district, the spokesman added.”

…..I suggest that they either need a new spin doctor, or a new way of thinking, because this current operation shows clearly that they have little concern for the towns and villages around them. Is there any wonder that the majority of ordinary everyday people in the street don’t like them? I always thought that our District Council was meant to be a solid and positive enabler in all our communities. They need to go back to school and learn how to think and do joined up writing. That would be a good and positive start to redressing the years of total mishandling of the taxes gathered from the hard working people of this District, and the countless bad decisions that cause hardship in our towns and villages. Only then can they even start to redress the damage they have done over the years.

Before anyone jumps the gun I am not critical of District Council Employees. They, like us work their socks off. This all stems from the political body who give the impression that they have nil awareness of the damage they are causing.

Posts: 1
Comment
Reasonable to enhance the Octagon Theatre?
Reply #2 on : Tue August 07, 2012, 10:32:20
"We believe most people will recognise that it is simply not financially feasible or sensible to seek to deliver professional arts and theatre in every market town area." It was therefore reasonable to enhance the Octagon Theatre, serving the whole district, the spokesman added.”

I think what we can recognise is a weak defence of an unjustifiable rationale. This isn't about Wincanton wanting a professional theatre in their own backyard, and they know it. It's about wanting to spend the money on far more needy projects in our own area.
Kate Kirkpatrick
Posts: 1
Comment
Concentrate on our own Drama!
Reply #3 on : Wed August 08, 2012, 17:47:50
It makes my skin crawl to think that Wincanton folk are expected to contribute towards activities in Yeovil and more specifically, The Octagon Theatre when we have ventures of our own in our own town we need to enforce and contribute to. Wincanton Amateur Dramatics Society for one. This is a group that needs financial local support - and one that despite being fruitful in its profits for years is now struggling withrehearsal and venue costs at The Memorial Hall. Although I am not directly involved with the group at the moment I understand theyare proposing a pantomime 'Beauty and the Beast' which will hopefully generate significant interest from local children and supporters.

My question is, how can groups like this expect to continue when costs are so high and support is so low? Surely our local politicians should be focussing on town own needs, talent and demand...
Victor Meldrew
Posts: 3
Comment
Re: Let's Be Clear On How Town Cash Is Spent
Reply #4 on : Sat August 11, 2012, 19:34:28
This is another fine example of SSDC giving priority to projects in Yeovil to the detriment of the rest of the District. Cast your minds back to their (still on going) Mudford Rec` project. This was well known to have been planned to have been paid for by the WHOLE district, the excuse was `Its a public space, and it will be used by all` It was also backed by someone who did not live in Yeovil, and someone else with an apparent vested interest. I also believe that the ,at the time, projected costs were £21m, guess what was in the bank from the sale of the housing stock! Question, where DID the monies from the "selling" of South Somerset Homes dissapear to?
Last Edit: August 15, 2012, 10:48:09 by Victor Meldrew  
Nick Colbert
Posts: 1
Comment
Why isn't our cash spent in our town
Reply #5 on : Sun August 12, 2012, 20:53:01
I have just returned from seeing relatives in the States and would like to thank David Smith for informing me about Wincanton Window printing this article.

I met with the civil servant at SSDC responsible, Mr Steve Joel, and argued with him for two hours about the theft of our money. He did not choose to agree with our viewpoint, indeed when I asked him directly "Don't you think the local representatives should be consulted as to where their communities need their health and leisure money spending", his answer was a mind numbingly simple NO!

The fact is South Somerset District Council deliberately take our money and they do it because they can, the Liberal Democrats have a majority in Yeovil and use it to take our money. They know but don't care that we are appalled by it.

That is why I exposed what they are doing, I can almost certainly garantee their method of dealing with this will be to do nothing and hope that it will die down when we tire of complaining, then they will continue to take our money as before. Mr Joel confirmed to me that they have no intention of changing their formula to bring about fairness.

This years annual subsidy to the Octagon Theatre is a staggering £340,000, that says to me not enough people patronise it and not at a ticket price that is realistic so they make you pay the balance through your rates and 106 monies rather than tackle the problem at the source.
Victor Meldrew
Posts: 3
Comment
Re: Let's Be Clear On How Town Cash Is Spent
Reply #6 on : Wed August 15, 2012, 10:58:32
To add to the discussion, it is my belief that Section 106 agreements are entered into to provide amienities in the area of the development that the 106 refers to. It was such an agreement that provided the crossing at Lidl/Morrisons as well as the on ain Station Road, albiet somewhat late. There is supposed to be Section 106 monies from the development off of Dukes Close to provide a play/amenity area for the estate. No doubt that has been stolen, for that is what it is THEFT, to boost the public facade (ego) of SSDC and its (overpaid) Officers!
johnsmith
Posts: 2
Comment
Section 106 Finance
Reply #7 on : Thu August 16, 2012, 10:48:14
Looking at the comments above it seems clear that the current elected body have a very shaky stance on this. I hold no allegiance to any political part, and the last thing I will be involved in is political bickering. That only serves to show clearly why politicians are minus three on the Richter scale of trust by the voters.

However, whatever the colour of the party, there is no excuse whatsoever for what can only be dubious financial practice. By his own statement Mr Joel show that he or his political masters have no conception about what is fair, or what is good for a local community.

It seems that when you reach one of those hallowed elected positions you have to give up/lose part of your basic humanity. By that I mean that their sense of honour, and fairness has either been seriously dented, or at worst, amputated leaving them on a power trip sitting safely in their offices behind walls of impenetrable protection to shield them from the frustrations of the ordinary everyday folk to voted them into position.

I guess that's the downside of living in a democracy. Sometimes, what or who you vote for can come back and bite you where it hurts.

I suggest that we need to find a platform where local communities can sit in meaningful discussion with those who hold the power of decision over us. How can this happen. How can the representatives of Wincanton achieve fair play in what us currently a cold and callous we don't care atmosphere. Whatever happened to lead by example? In the bible even Jesus told his disciples that if they wanted to be great they had to be the least, and serve the people.

I don't see the current elected body serving. I can only see them ruling the roost from a very remote location.

We need a change of attitude to show that our elected body serve our communities.
Victor Meldrew
Posts: 3
Comment
Re: Let's Be Clear On How Town Cash Is Spent
Reply #8 on : Thu August 16, 2012, 22:18:45
This is a letter that for some unknown reason I never sent to the Westgaz, perhaps because I believe they are the SSDC lapdog.
I am not surprised to see that the majority of the monies from a 106 Agreement for a deveplopment here in Wincanton is being spent in Yeovil,( West gaz 17 May). It as been obvious for years that it is only Yeovil that is of any importance to SSDC.I have voiced this opinion in the past, even to Town Council,but it was frowned upon. Why do we have democraticly elected represenatives when 90% of decisions are made by Council EMPLOYEES, what ever their position? In the case of Planning , surely they are there to ensure the the correct decisions are made by the Councilors and not to make the decision as to what is built an where, this can (and does?) lead to all sorts of conclusions. In the past there have been examples where the Planners have over-ruled not only the Local Council objections but the residents ones as well.

Login to comment!

© 2009 Wincanton Window    -    Site designed, hosted and maintained by Link-2